Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is off to India to talk of many things, not the least of which is climate change. In a session at the Council on Foreign Relations earlier in the week, she said “We know that India and China have understandable questions about what role they should be expected to play in any kind of new global climate change regime. Our Special Envoy for Climate Change Todd Stern will be with me. And it is our hope that we can, through dialogue, come up with some win-win approaches.” Todd Stern is, to my mind, one of the top-tier American diplomats - at least this year - on a par with George Mitchell, Richard Holbrooke and Dennis Ross. As I’ve written here numerous times, the Obama Administration is working hard to effect progress, both on the international front and on domestic legislation. The two, of course, go hand in hand.
Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Stern in this visit, and the President and others at meetings such as the recent Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate (MEF) in Italy, continue to emphasize the importance of getting the major industrializing economies on board. The “Times of India” in an article today about some of the domestic push and pull on the international climate change negotiations, noted that “For the US, the meeting would hold as much significance as the Obama administration is hard pressed to prove to its domestic audience that India and China will also sign on to a global deal where they also undertake ‘meaningful’ and ‘prompt’ emission reduction actions. Obama would find it difficult to get an international agreement accepted at home which commits US to emission caps but leaves out India and China.” You can say that twice.
Clinton wants India to “leapfrog” its way to a clean energy economy, avoiding the pitfalls - including all the attendant pollution - of a hyperindustrialized society reliant on fossil fuels. In remarks yesterday, as reported by the AP here, she said “Just as India went from a few years ago having very few mobile phones to now having more than 500 million mostly cell phones by leapfrogging over the infrastructure we built for telephone service, we believe India is innovative and entrepreneurial enough to figure out how to deal with climate change while continuing to lift people out of poverty and develop at a rapid rate.” Bingo.
The developed economies have long-since stipulated that technology transfer and financial support should be part of the formula for achieving this felicitous outcome. To what extent is a key part of the international negotiations in the run up to Copenhagen.
Strobe Talbott, president of the Brookings Institution, had a good op-ed in the “FT” this week in which he addressed Clinton’s visit and climate change. He concludes by writing “Indians (like many Americans) need to be persuaded to see the urgency of prompt action. There are few voices more persuasive than that of the Indian scientist R. K. Pachauri, the head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change who shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore. He believes that the world has about six years to impose drastic and effective reductions on greenhouse gases. That will only happen if Mr Pachauri’s and Mrs Clinton’s governments can make common cause.”
.
1 Comments So Far»
India-USA relation is very natural as the relation between Sino-USA. It has lately been able to recognize by the USA that India is its primordial ally. Both the countries share similar humane liberal treasures of birth rights, speech and be political or social association. Besides, China-USA relation is only deliberated ones following Sino-Soviet relation broke. Now a days, China will never like India go near to USA because the former has had bit a large territories of the latter in illegal manner. The former still demands more land from the latter. Inorder to put pressure on India, China is secretly assisting Pakistan get nuclear weapons. At one time China secrectly facilited its space to be used for its missile launch capable assisted North Korea and its nuclear weapon capable assisted Pakistan to exchange nuclear war head materials and missile components to one another. Frankly, China is a bin of western pollution in one way and in another way it is also nuclear proliferator which it help built weapons to North Korea, Pakistan, and Libya. There needs a stringent action against China on nuclear pollution in the world today. India was a peace loving country. It still advocate peace in all forms. India was compelled to acquire nuclear weapons because of China’s nuclear proliferation around her. Today India has nuclear weapons which is indegenous and has not proliferated nuclear weapons to any other countries. While framing, climate actions, it is a must not to impose penalties which India has not commited anything so far. There needs India specific climate action which will bring yet another initiation from the India soil to the world at large.
Leave Comments Below»