<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon Finance and Investment Summit</title>
	<link>http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/06/01/carbon-finance-and-investment-summit/</link>
	<description>The official Web log for Great Decisions 2007</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: miggs</title>
		<link>http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/06/01/carbon-finance-and-investment-summit/#comment-1554</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/06/01/carbon-finance-and-investment-summit/#comment-1554</guid>
					<description>I'm glad you mentioned cogeneration at the very end!  I'm associated with Recycled Energy Development, a company that does exactly that -- converting excess heat into electricity and steam.  The result is greater efficiency, which in turn means slashing both power costs and greenhouse pollution.  There's a simple answer as to why more cogeneration isn't being done: regulations protect inefficient utilities.  As a result, ultra-efficient options like cogeneration aren't nearly as prevalent as they should be.  But consider the possibilities: EPA and DoE studies suggest technologies like cogeneration and waste heat recovery could produce 40% of the nation's electricity, cutting greenhouse gases by about 20%.  That's the heart of the matter, and we should be discussing it more.  We have some background on the subject here if anyone's interested: http://recycled-energy.com/_documents/media-kit/backgrounder.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you mentioned cogeneration at the very end!  I&#8217;m associated with Recycled Energy Development, a company that does exactly that &#8212; converting excess heat into electricity and steam.  The result is greater efficiency, which in turn means slashing both power costs and greenhouse pollution.  There&#8217;s a simple answer as to why more cogeneration isn&#8217;t being done: regulations protect inefficient utilities.  As a result, ultra-efficient options like cogeneration aren&#8217;t nearly as prevalent as they should be.  But consider the possibilities: EPA and DoE studies suggest technologies like cogeneration and waste heat recovery could produce 40% of the nation&#8217;s electricity, cutting greenhouse gases by about 20%.  That&#8217;s the heart of the matter, and we should be discussing it more.  We have some background on the subject here if anyone&#8217;s interested: <a href='http://recycled-energy.com/_documents/media-kit/backgrounder.pdf' rel='nofollow'>http://recycled-energy.com/_documents/media-kit/backgrounder.pdf</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
