<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biofuels , Boon or Bane?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/24/biofuels-%e2%80%93-boon-or-bane-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/24/biofuels-%e2%80%93-boon-or-bane-2/</link>
	<description>The World Affairs Blog Network</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Benefits of Biofuel</title>
		<link>http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/24/biofuels-%e2%80%93-boon-or-bane-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>Benefits of Biofuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/24/biofuels-%e2%80%93-boon-or-bane-2/#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>That&#39; s important, because regardless of what you may be implying, we are not burning all our food. Rather, we are simply raising the possible markets for food. Don&#39; t believe me? As I&#39; m sure you know, the US is the largest consumer and producer of biofuels, and is one of only two countries in which a significant amount of biofuels are consumed. So if biofuels are squeezing world food supply, it should be seen here first above all else, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39; s important, because regardless of what you may be implying, we are not burning all our food. Rather, we are simply raising the possible markets for food. Don&#39; t believe me? As I&#39; m sure you know, the US is the largest consumer and producer of biofuels, and is one of only two countries in which a significant amount of biofuels are consumed. So if biofuels are squeezing world food supply, it should be seen here first above all else, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Palmer</title>
		<link>http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/24/biofuels-%e2%80%93-boon-or-bane-2/comment-page-1/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/24/biofuels-%e2%80%93-boon-or-bane-2/#comment-767</guid>
		<description>I completely agree that there are good biofuels, bad biofuels, and biofuels whose net value is ambiguous.  Those interested in the distinction between Low-Input, High-Diversity (LIHD) and High-input, Low Diversity (HILD) biofuels might be interested in the LIHD blog: http://testone.okstate.edu/debo/blogs/index.php

--Mike Palmer, Professor of Botany, Oklahoma State University</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree that there are good biofuels, bad biofuels, and biofuels whose net value is ambiguous.  Those interested in the distinction between Low-Input, High-Diversity (LIHD) and High-input, Low Diversity (HILD) biofuels might be interested in the LIHD blog: <a href="http://testone.okstate.edu/debo/blogs/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://testone.okstate.edu/debo/blogs/index.php</a></p>
<p>&#8211;Mike Palmer, Professor of Botany, Oklahoma State University</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
