Congestion Pricing in New York
“The best-laid schemes o’ mice an ‘men
Gang aft agley,
An’lea’e us nought but grief an’ pain,
For promis’d joy!”
Congestion pricing, a rollicking success story in London, Stockholm and Singapore, may have taken a massive hit yesterday when the NY State Legislature declined to advance the legislation necessary for New York City to proceed, and to meet a federal deadline for funding. However, as of this morning, there are differing reports. The most hopeful is from the A.P. via Newsday: Spitzer’s office: New traffic proposal possible. It appears, contrary to the reports this morning from the “NY Times,” that the powers that be (Mayor Bloomberg, Governor Spitzer, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno) may have found some solutions. Silver and Bruno appear to have been up to the wee hours working out a modus vivendi. Spitzer’s office said: “… there’s no firm agreement on a plan, but there is hope for a deal.”
Mike Bloomberg’s excellent, ambitious plan, universally and enthusiastically endorsed by environmental groups, including NRDC and Environmental Defense (see their extensive “road pricing” web pages here), may yet not be dead in the water, and upwards of $500 million in federal money that might have gone to underwrite some of the costs may not go elsewhere.
(I should note that I am delighted that $500 million exists at all for congestion pricing initiatives in the federal budget. If New York City doesn’t get a share, other worthy cities will. I just think that you’d get an awful lot of bang for the buck here in The Big Apple. In any event, we need the state legislature and governor to agree to make the thing go forward.)
Update - As of late this morning, AP reports Mayor says traffic plan dead, blames Assembly. Here’s where I start my rant: I have commented here recently on some of the lamentable results of special interest politics in Congress. In New York State, it’s worse. There is a unique brand of suburban and Outer Borough “know-nothingism” to which this state has been shackled for years.
Here’s one pithy quote from the “NY Times” City Room blog that says a lot: “Well, the folks with the cars have won and NYC has just lost 30 express bus lines. Robert Moses is sooo happy.”
Got a take on this? Let us know.
Aftermath - A story in today’s “NY Times” (it’s now Wednesday) attributes a fair bit of blame for this nearly tragic failure to Bloomberg and his people being politically inept. Longtime Assemblyman Dick Brodsky, who spent many years as chair of the Environmental Conservation committee, said about Bloomberg: “When it came time to deal with people he didn’t control, he didn’t know how to do it.” Another oldtimer, Dick Gottfried, said: “The constant drumbeat of the deadline may have done more harm than good — people got their backs up.”
Here’s a little inside baseball on the local politics of all this from the “NY Post.”
But wait, are there Flickers of life in congestion-pricing issue? Maybe, according to veteran Albany correspondent Jay Gallagher.
“Stop The Presses” (Update on July 19) - Jay Gallagher was right. Here’s an afternoon headline from “Crain’s NY Business” - NY officials in congestion pricing pact. The deal calls for a 17-member commission to develop and implement a three-year pilot program beginning in 2009. Here’s a press release from the Governor’s office and one from the Mayor’s office. Go to the Crain’s article to see the gothic interdependence of this critical environmental initiative with campaign finance reform and salary increases for legislators.
Okay, folks, let’s get on it.
March 24th, 2008 at 9:16 pm
Congestion pricnig is an invasion of privacy for everyone, with or without a car. It would be great to have less congestion on the streets in Manhattan, however one aspect which I have not seen discussed is the fact that the program will install several thousand TV cameras which are designed as both face recognition cameras as well as license plate recognition capabilities. The result will be that every aspect of every New Yorkers life will be observable and trackable. All elements of privacy will be eliminated. Though the program is supposed to work from 6AM to 6PM, there is little doubt that the location of people and cars will be tracked 24 hours per day, 7 days a week.
Before Congestion Pricing is passed, privacy issues MUST be discussed and strong protections must be put in place. Perhaps a special provision to the law should include a law stating that all files are to be destroyed and the data expunged after a set period of time, such as 24 hours.
Let’s make a better City, but without the total loss of privacy.
March 30th, 2008 at 8:26 am
Comment:
My husband and I have doctor appoints at 80th St and dental appointments for special surgery, and knee replacements schedules at Mt. Sinai, and New York Presbyterian twice this year. Care is excellent, but we are elderly and paying additional fees to parking which is very high, the tunnel which jumped to 8 dollars recently both of which come to around 40 dollars now + add congestion pricing? I realize this is no longer a free, just society. I have lives here my life– medical issues are important to the quality of our life. STOP TAXING US ON OUR SURVIVAL!
AN IRATE, RETIRED, TAX PAYING RESIDENT OF HOBOKEN.
March 30th, 2008 at 8:28 am
MODERATION IS THE RECOGNITION THAT RESIDENTS OF THE usa MUST PRESERVE FREEDOM.
April 13th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
This is just another intolerable tax, especially for small business people like myself who have to work in NYC. Having a commercial vehicle, I’d be charged $21 and that would go up every couple of years. Bloomberg is already fleecing people with his gestapo parking ticket tactics. And the idiot traffic agents don’t do anything to ease traffic. Also, the bridge & tunnel tolls just went up. That didn’t do anything for congestion. So all the trucks, cabs and busses are going to go away with congestion pricing?
The supporters of this tax are ignorant.